In a bold move that has sparked both support and satire across social media platforms, Whoopi Goldberg, co-host of the popular daytime talk show "The View," has announced her participation in a sex strike as a form of political protest. This decision comes after the re-election of Donald Trump, an outcome that has left many on the left side of the political spectrum searching for ways to express their dissent.

Goldberg, known for her outspoken views on ABC's "The View," took to X (formerly known as Twitter) to declare her involvement in the strike, stating, "If we don’t let you, you don’t get any. It’s that simple." This statement has ignited a flurry of reactions from fans and critics alike, with some lauding the actress and comedian's commitment to her political beliefs, while others have responded with jest, suggesting that the strike might not have the widespread impact she might hope for.

The concept of a sex strike, while seemingly unconventional, has roots in historical and literary precedents, most famously depicted in Aristophanes' play "Lysistrata." In modern contexts, similar actions have been used globally to protest various issues, from violence against women to political corruption.

According to posts on X, the strike is part of a broader movement among liberal women, aiming to use this form of protest as leverage in the wake of what they perceive as unfavorable political developments. The exact demands or goals of the strike weren't explicitly detailed by Goldberg, but the implication is clear: it's a stand against policies and political figures with whom they disagree.

Public reactions have varied:

- Some supporters view this as a powerful symbolic gesture, emphasizing the power of collective action.
- Critics and satirists on X have humorously pointed out the perceived lack of impact this might have, with comments like "Not a single man was affected by this news."

The announcement has also led to discussions about the effectiveness of such protests in today's political climate. While some argue that it brings visibility to their cause, others question its practicality and the seriousness with which it will be taken.

As the country continues to navigate through its deeply polarized political landscape, actions like Goldberg's serve as reminders of the ongoing, often creative, methods of political engagement and protest. Whether this strike will influence any political change remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly adds to the conversation on how citizens can express their political will in non-traditional ways.