In a recent wave of criticism, the mainstream media finds itself under intense scrutiny for its apparent failure to adequately recognize Vice President Kamala Harris's designation as the "border czar" by President Joe Biden. This controversy has sparked discussions on media bias and selective coverage amidst the ongoing challenges at the border.

Since her appointment to oversee efforts related to the Southern border, Vice President Harris has faced mounting pressure and public attention regarding the handling of immigration issues. Despite being explicitly named as the point person on matters concerning the border, the media narrative surrounding her role has been notably subdued or altogether absent in certain news reports and analyses.

Critics argue that the mainstream media's portrayal of Harris fails to acknowledge the significant responsibility conferred upon her by President Biden. As the designated "border czar," Harris was entrusted with a pivotal role in addressing the complex and pressing issues at the border, including immigration policies, border security, and diplomatic relations with neighboring countries.

However, various media outlets have been accused of downplaying or sidelining Harris's position as the "border czar," leading to questions about transparency, journalistic integrity, and fair representation in reporting. The discrepancy between the official appointment and the media's treatment of Harris's role has raised concerns about the potential influence of media narratives on public perception and understanding of key government functions.

Moreover, the lack of emphasis on Harris's responsibilities as the "border czar" has fueled speculation about underlying motives or biases within certain media circles. Some critics suggest that the oversight or omission of Harris's title and duties may be indicative of a broader trend of media favoritism or agenda-setting, where certain narratives are prioritized or sidelined based on political considerations.

As the debate around Kamala Harris's role as the "border czar" continues to gain traction, calls for greater transparency, accountability, and balanced coverage in the mainstream media have grown louder. The spotlight on this issue underscores the importance of accurate and comprehensive reporting in shaping public discourse and fostering informed civic engagement on critical matters such as immigration and border security.