In an unprecedented move that has sparked controversy, San Francisco has appointed Kelly Wong, a staunch advocate for immigrant rights, as the first noncitizen member of its elections commission. This decision has been met with significant opposition from a segment of the city's population, who express concerns about the implications of such an appointment.

Critics argue that this decision undermines the essence of citizenship and the privileges that come with it, including the right to participate in the electoral process. They fear that it sets a dangerous precedent, allowing noncitizens to have a say in matters that should be reserved for American citizens.

The fact that Wong is an immigrant from Hong Kong adds another layer of complexity to the situation. With San Francisco's deep economic ties to China, some critics worry about potential foreign influence in local government decisions. They see Wong's appointment as a potential gateway for China to slowly infiltrate California's political landscape.

While these concerns might seem far-fetched to some, they reflect a growing unease among a portion of the city's residents. The decision to appoint a noncitizen to an influential position within the elections commission has inadvertently highlighted the divide between those who champion inclusivity at all costs and those who believe certain rights and responsibilities should be exclusive to citizens.

San Francisco has long been known for its progressive policies, but this recent move has ignited a contentious debate about the boundaries of inclusivity. As the city moves forward, it will need to navigate this issue carefully to ensure that all voices are heard and respected.